↓ Skip to main content

A simple and precise method for pricing convertible bond with credit risk

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
A simple and precise method for pricing convertible bond with credit risk
Published in
Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds, February 2014
DOI 10.1057/jdhf.2014.5
Authors

Tim Xiao

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Student > Master 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 83%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,890,398
of 13,155,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds
#1
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,689
of 196,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,155,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them