↓ Skip to main content

A survey of submesoscale currents

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
A survey of submesoscale currents
Published in
Geoscience Letters, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40562-019-0133-3
Authors

James C. McWilliams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 43%
Environmental Science 6 11%
Engineering 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#10,830,370
of 18,030,125 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#51
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,837
of 276,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,030,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them