| Title |
Progress on bringing together raptor collections in Europe for contaminant research and monitoring in relation to chemicals regulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11356-019-05340-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paola Movalli, Guy Duke, Gloria Ramello, René Dekker, Al Vrezec, Richard F. Shore, Antonio García-Fernández, Chris Wernham, Oliver Krone, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Alexander Badry, Fausto Barbagli, Koos Biesmeijer, Giovanni Boano, Alexander L. Bond, Yael Choresh, Jan Bolding Christensen, Alessandra Cincinelli, Sara Danielsson, Andreia Dias, Rune Dietz, Marcel Eens, Silvia Espín, Igor Eulaers, Sylke Frahnert, Tibor I. Fuiz, Georgios Gkotsis, Natalia Glowacka, Pilar Gómez-Ramírez, Marco Grotti, Michel Guiraud, Peter Hosner, Ulf Johansson, Veerle L.B. Jaspers, Pepijn Kamminga, Jan Koschorreck, Burkhard Knopf, Eero Kubin, Sabrina LoBrutto, Rui Lourenco, Tania Martellini, Emma Martínez-López, Rafael Mateo, Maria-Christina Nika, Varvara Nikolopoulou, Dan Osborn, Olivier Pauwels, Marco Pavia, M. Glória Pereira, Heinz Rüdel, Pablo Sanchez-Virosta, Jaroslav Slobodnik, Christian Sonne, Nikolaos Thomaidis, Till Töpfer, Gabriele Treu, Risto Väinölä, Jari Valkama, Steven van der Mije, Didier Vangeluwe, Ben H. Warren, Friederike Woog |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 24% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,956,212
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,008
of 11,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,894
of 367,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#21
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.