↓ Skip to main content

Neotropical dancing frog: the rich repertoire of visual displays in a hylodine species

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Neotropical dancing frog: the rich repertoire of visual displays in a hylodine species
Published in
Journal of Ethology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10164-019-00600-x
Authors

Raíssa Furtado, Luísa N. Lermen, Rafael Márquez, Sandra M. Hartz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#11,898,434
of 13,420,122 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#254
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,002
of 245,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,420,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.