Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs

RT @svateboje: Kralemann & Lattmann's "Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs" connects CSP…

and CSP: https://t.co/YpiGllpOyZ

what is groovy here is a surprising (for me) resemblance to CSPs icons as element in dicisigns (as in Stjernfelt's treatments https://t.co/C245Mu6Yhc) and in models (as in Kralemann & Lattmann https://t.co/YpiGllpOyZ). need time to think through the cl

CSP cross-refs: https://t.co/d5I2YSTVvT https://t.co/xfVe2OSMSd

cross-refs on diagrammatic logic via focus on semiotic continuity among language & models. https://t.co/jUrZiU52QS https://t.co/xfVe2OSMSd

cross-ref with link to a Kralemaann & Lattmann paper making a much better argument for the continuity btwn models & language (among other things) than my rambling here https://t.co/xfVe2OSMSd

Kralemann & Lattmann's "Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs" connects CSPs diagrams directly to the modern phil of science topic of models. fantastic & rich paper: https://t.co/MzdsyZioW8