RT @colognav: Importantly, climate scientists with higher carbon footprints have been found to be less effective advocates: https://t.co/J1…
Importantly, climate scientists with higher carbon footprints have been found to be less effective advocates: https://t.co/J1n4efVf6W 7/8 https://t.co/nUsozyxogO
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
Totally think this point is not taken seriously enough
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @Scubike1142: De la nécessité d’être exemplaire quand on parle de changement climatique
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @Alex__Morrison: Anyone involved in climate change comms and policy please note. If you don’t walk the walk, no-one will believe your…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
RT @SciRebFr: Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité…
Peut-on plaider contre le réchauffement climatique sans réduire sa propre empreinte CO2 ? La réponse est NON La crédibilité de chacun repose sur la cohérence Cela vaut pour les individus mais aussi pour les individus mais aussi pour les Institutions ⤵️⤵️
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @Alex__Morrison: Anyone involved in climate change comms and policy please note. If you don’t walk the walk, no-one will believe your…
Anyone involved in climate change comms and policy please note. If you don’t walk the walk, no-one will believe your talk. @TTTMediaXR
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
De la nécessité d’être exemplaire quand on parle de changement climatique
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
Fits very well us sustainable tourism academics as well.
RT @colognav: They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tel…
They made a good point: How bad can climate change really be, when leaders like John Kerry fly around the world, but then tell people not to fly? ✈️ This is in line with evidence showing that advocates with high carbon footprints are less effective: https:
@BBCJustinR If you're a climate breakdown communicator, you're less effective if you also decide to fly: https://t.co/ikLoFzZEBH
@jonburkeUK @peterwalker99 That said, if you want to be a climate communicator, better to restrain own emissions in order to help achieve that societal change: https://t.co/l8gppYJTRx
RT @benmsanderson: And scientists who are seen to be taking action to reduce their own carbon footprint were seen to be more reliable in pu…
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION OF climate science and advocacy of both individual behavior change and public policy interventions are greatly helped when advocates lead the way by reducing their own carbon footprint… 🤗 https://t.co/5YJY3RaTjE
And scientists who are seen to be taking action to reduce their own carbon footprint were seen to be more reliable in public opinion, on average. /7 https://t.co/QZwWECds39
@calieber @punished_cait https://t.co/byTfGI3al1 Individual action directly impacts public policies.
7/15. Noget tyder endda på, at folk er mere(!) tilbøjelige til at tage forskere seriøst, såfremt der er en overensstemmelse med det, de siger, og deres egen adfærd. Se denne artikel: https://t.co/i5POfU6pO3
@MacLesggy En voilà une sur l'exemplarité : https://t.co/qztuU2zZ5B . Il y en a d'autres. Ce n'est pas parce que vous ne savez pas qu'il n'y en a pas. Quand à la baisse de conso, si la pub ne fonctionne pas, autant l'arrêter si elle est inutile non ?
@koheisaito0131 気候コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは聴衆の政策支持に影響を与える https://t.co/qir1XFaOQW
as much as I’ve thought about this, it’s a novel twist, and really gets at why I find it excruciating when people with a platform in magazines, podcasts, environmental ngos, newspapers, that NYT guy, justify why it’s fine for them to consume the most destr
RT @jan_dutkiewicz: Ditto for the individual actions don’t matter message. Debatable at the best of times, but as a climate and food commun…
@steviedubyu @PHellermann From a relevant thread today: https://t.co/Wc2dO28VCa
Indeed! Got a book that had been recommended. Chapter on "How to be a good climate citizen": "It's true that eating less meat and dairy is good for climate as well as health but consumption should not be seen as an individualized pursuit".Then: "I'm an occ
La petite polémique à propos du PSG m'a rappelé ce papier sur l'importance pour les chercheurs qui travaillent et communiquent sur les questions environnementales de montrer l'exemple via leur empreinte carbone pour rendre leur communication plus efficace.
RT @jan_dutkiewicz: Ditto for the individual actions don’t matter message. Debatable at the best of times, but as a climate and food commun…
Ditto for the individual actions don’t matter message. Debatable at the best of times, but as a climate and food communicator, your individual actions and messaging about them matter more than anonymous consumer behavior. I always come back to this study:
@picharbonnier @_LoboTom_ En fait il y a trés peu des célébrités climate friendly qui "walk the talk" - ne prend pas d'avion, vivent sans voiture, mange pas viande, etc. C'est ce genre des trucs qui change vraiment comment les gens pensent https://t.co/bjR
In the interview (video in thread), Rees makes a point about mayors needing to shape international policy. Well if you want to do that then don't fly – people listen to climate communicators' policy preferences when their behaviour matches the message. h
@DoctorVive @KHayhoe @JohnMashey This paper suggests that people are more likely to listen to climate communicators' policy preferences if said communicator leads a sustainable lifestyle. There are limitations to the data, but it exists! https://t.co/Dh6
RT @kristiansn89: @DoctorVive @JohnMashey @KHayhoe I might be misremembering, but I think this article tries to get at this issue: https://…
@DoctorVive @JohnMashey @KHayhoe I might be misremembering, but I think this article tries to get at this issue: https://t.co/HswxRS41hI
RT @s_now177: 気候変動コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは、聴衆の政策支持に影響を与える https://t.co/qir1XFrRSW
@a_sator @R_Steurer @ReiSteurer @Shahzeen And provided more evidence here.... https://t.co/UOsZYAPzQ4
@AnthonyTeacher Hi Anthony! For individual<-> collective action, I recommend to start with: 1. https://t.co/wBC75hVqkz by @Shahzeen et al; 2. https://t.co/RApFNhKDS6 by @leorhackel & @GreggRSparkman; 3. https://t.co/VZYnGCqM44 by @JKSteinberge
i.e the idea of 'purity' is dependent on who its applied to. Research shows that a person's climate message is stronger if it matches their own behaviour: https://t.co/Dh6SiTDrXC. For random person x, 'purity' is less important because their reach is too.
気候変動コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは、聴衆の政策支持に影響を与える https://t.co/qir1XFrRSW
@IsabelleLetell1 @Richard95843117 @KevinClimate @MGSchmelzer @LuckyHeronSay @jasonhickel @StayGroundedNet Yes @Shahzeen has produced evidence that climate communicators are more effective and credible if they visibly walk the talk... https://t.co/jRTqWvobL
@susannegoetze @derfreitag Yes and no. Nicht jede:r muss Flugscham haben, aber wir climate people sollten uns schon um Authentizität bemühen. https://t.co/2xREhAC2ZT
@Shahzeen keynote: Climate communicators need to walk the talk for behavior and policy endorsement. Work w/ @elkeweber https://t.co/kJzyd8GT3B #SPSPSP21 5/8
- that those who need to reduce their environmental footprint the most are those with the most power and agency to do so, both nationally and individually. - that climate advocates and scientists who walk the talk are more effective communicators 5/ ht
"コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは、エネルギーを節約しようとする聴衆の信頼性と意志に大きな影響を与えることがわかった。" https://t.co/qir1XFrRSW
@a_sator Stimme voll zu, wobei aber auch und vor allem der Teil "and talk about it" von "try to live differently and talk about it" nicht zu unterschätzen ist. Dafür muss man auch gar nicht "perfekt" handeln. https://t.co/7LeuZbfFkp
RT @StayGroundedNet: Great, @GlobalEcoGuy has cut back his flights! It's important that climate communicators set a positive example. That…
Great, @GlobalEcoGuy has cut back his flights! It's important that climate communicators set a positive example. That also makes their messages more credible and effective! This is shown by studies like this one: https://t.co/QG68UF8Smn
@steviedubyu @EricHolthaus @GlobalEcoGuy @whetherandhow @ProjectDrawdown @waiterich @EASA Also: "Climate change communicators’ carbon footprints affect their audience’s policy support" "effective communication of climate science and advocacy … are greatly
RT @s_now177: @leglaneur1 以前ツイートしましたが、こういう研究結果もあるので、気候学者や気候&環境問題について発信している人のライフスタイルは影響がありますよね。 気候変動コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは、聴衆の政策支持に影響を与える ht…
RT @s_now177: @leglaneur1 以前ツイートしましたが、こういう研究結果もあるので、気候学者や気候&環境問題について発信している人のライフスタイルは影響がありますよね。 気候変動コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは、聴衆の政策支持に影響を与える ht…
RT @s_now177: @leglaneur1 以前ツイートしましたが、こういう研究結果もあるので、気候学者や気候&環境問題について発信している人のライフスタイルは影響がありますよね。 気候変動コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは、聴衆の政策支持に影響を与える ht…
@leglaneur1 以前ツイートしましたが、こういう研究結果もあるので、気候学者や気候&環境問題について発信している人のライフスタイルは影響がありますよね。 気候変動コミュニケーターのカーボンフットプリントは、聴衆の政策支持に影響を与える https://t.co/qir1XFrRSW
@gordon_struth @clairefrwordley Blimey! Have you seen this? https://t.co/U2cEA6e73s
@Brtgfchrt @carogilposse These studies from @Shahzeen suggest climate advocates are more credible and gain more support if they themselves have lower carbon footprints. https://t.co/jRTqWvobLY https://t.co/UOsZYAPzQ4
Het lijkt me dat jullie standpunten elkaar niet uitsluiten
@JaapTielbeke Een lezer tipte me nog trouwens: 'We find that people are more likely to support policies if the advocate for these policies has a low carbon footprint. (...) we find that the communicators’ carbon footprint massively affect their credibility