↓ Skip to main content

Calibration Methods Used in Cancer Simulation Models and Suggested Reporting Guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Calibration Methods Used in Cancer Simulation Models and Suggested Reporting Guidelines
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/11314830-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha K. Stout, Amy B. Knudsen, Chung Yin Kong, Pamela M. McMahon, G. Scott Gazelle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 109 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 14 12%
Other 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 25%
Engineering 12 10%
Mathematics 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 34 28%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#996
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,665
of 189,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#227
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.