↓ Skip to main content

Potentials and limitations for the identification of outdoor dung plasters in humid tropical environment: a geo-ethnoarchaeological case study from South India

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Potentials and limitations for the identification of outdoor dung plasters in humid tropical environment: a geo-ethnoarchaeological case study from South India
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12520-018-0682-y
Authors

Shira Gur-Arieh, Marco Madella, Noa Lavi, David E. Friesem

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Librarian 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 38%
Arts and Humanities 2 25%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,301,279
of 13,770,158 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#61
of 346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,872
of 253,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#14
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,770,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.