↓ Skip to main content

Potentials and limitations for the identification of outdoor dung plasters in humid tropical environment: a geo-ethnoarchaeological case study from South India

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 816)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Potentials and limitations for the identification of outdoor dung plasters in humid tropical environment: a geo-ethnoarchaeological case study from South India
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12520-018-0682-y
Authors

Shira Gur-Arieh, Marco Madella, Noa Lavi, David E. Friesem

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 8 29%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#906,417
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#44
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,048
of 336,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.