@BotskiRusska @GeraldKutney @JunkScience @maxinejoselow @MichaelEMann Then there's this... https://t.co/TJDnr0TYcn
Helt absurd at biologer ikke kan forstå at vi er nogen som mener at vild natur er ekstremt vigtigt og at vi skal have meget af det, samtidig skal vi også reducere udledninger fra landbruget hvis biodiversiteten skal have optimale kår. https://t.co/ssleS3PI
@KennethBondo @ejrn_s Kan i ikke læse ? Jeg har sagt gennem hele tråden at vi skal have så meget vild natur så muligt men vi skal samtidig reducere udledningerne fra landbruget hurtigt! Det ikke enten eller men både og hvorfor er det så svært at forstå. ht
@ejrn_s Vil du modsat størstedelen af alle forskere konkludere at temperaturstigninger ikke er et problem for biodiversiteten ?? https://t.co/ssleS3PIca https://t.co/aiDNFhDvzL
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
RT @ClimateBen: Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperatur…
Biodiversity: Is below 2°C enough? 'our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperature well below 2°C protects biodiversity. Therefore, we support the pledge to keep climate change below 1.5°C and preferably lower..' h
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
RT @ClimateBen: Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, ar…
Reducing the rate of annihilation is only possible if all pressures occuring during capitalism, not just climate change, are reduced or eliminated. https://t.co/m1SO9F8JUs
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our res…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our res…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our res…
RT @ClimateBen: It's media silence/distortion which makes me desperate (enough to risk looking untrustworty/foolish as scientists chastise…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: It's media silence/distortion which makes me desperate (enough to risk looking untrustworty/foolish as scientists chastise…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our res…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @mweiss_tue: Of course there is no evidence that a climate target of 1,5 degrees protects biodiversity — because in the first place it…
It's media silence/distortion which makes me desperate (enough to risk looking untrustworty/foolish as scientists chastise me). This paper was ignored by media. Seems important if 1.5-2C may not protect biodiversity? 3/ https://t.co/m1SO9F8JUs
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our res…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
@LeviGratton These scientists seem to concur with the studies I cited, and 'support the pledge to keep climate change below 1.5C and preferably below' because 2C is so dangerous. So I'd say it backs up my points. https://t.co/m1SO9FqkM0
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
Of course there is no evidence that a climate target of 1,5 degrees protects biodiversity — because in the first place it is simply us humans who DIRECTLY cause the biodiversity crisis by habitat destruction. We (sadly) don‘t even need a heating planet
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our res…
RT @ClimateBen: Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t…
Certainly our predicament is not an Either/Or scenario. The Earth habitat toxic twins of Biodiversity Destruction & Climate Change Weather Extremes run in parallel & it's becoming just a matter of time which one gets us first. We'll notice when th
Extinction threats become much worse from 2.3-3.3C, but biodiversity isn't even necessarily protected at 1.5-2C: https://t.co/r3lNNlkQwU
RT @ClimateBen: 'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our res…
'Although our results support the notion that higher impacts of climate change will occur with higher temperatures, our results do not provide evidence that a climate target of keeping global temperature well below 2 °C protects biodiversity.' https://t.c
@WWF_Deutschland Vielleicht sollte man sich um die ungleich größeren Auslöser des globalen Artenverlustes kümmern: https://t.co/RL4KKAraiz & https://t.co/AQAgkxqv3W. Aber das würde ja persönlichen Verzicht erfordern. Katzen einsperren ist so viel einfa
Assessing the impacts of climate change on biodiversity: is below 2 °C enough? | SpringerLink This research supports the pledge to limit climate change to 1.5 °C and preferably lower to protect biodiversity #investEUresearch #futureofEurope https://t.co/Eb
Assessing the impacts of climate change on biodiversity: is below 2 °C enough? https://t.co/Q9nWstS78p
RT @mammuthus: For me personally, reduced impacts on biodiversity are probably the strongest reason to aim for 1.5C (so long as our mitigat…
For me personally, reduced impacts on biodiversity are probably the strongest reason to aim for 1.5C (so long as our mitigation actions don't do too much damage along the way). Here's another paper showing big benefits at lower than 2 https://t.co/dLz3o7hA
Assessing the impacts of climate change on biodiversity: is below 2 °C enough? https://t.co/Uc79c3EBfJ
CC: Assessing the impacts of climate change on biodiversity: is below 2 °C enough? https://t.co/F0r5moXX9W https://t.co/FkJtANRnh3
Assessing the impacts of climate change on biodiversity: is below 2 °C enough? https://t.co/w7cOZ27A2N #climatechange