↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Genetically engineered probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains mature human dendritic cells and stimulate gag-specific memory CD8+ T cells ex vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Correction to: Genetically engineered probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains mature human dendritic cells and stimulate gag-specific memory CD8+ T cells ex vivo
Published in
Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00253-019-09911-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana L. Palma, Tatiana M. Garcia-Bates, Flaviano S. Martins, Bruno Douradinha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,390,726
of 13,116,968 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#3,604
of 5,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,430
of 188,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#20
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,116,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.