| Title |
Taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales: update 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-019-04247-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaya K. Amarasinghe, María A. Ayllón, Yīmíng Bào, Christopher F. Basler, Sina Bavari, Kim R. Blasdell, Thomas Briese, Paul A. Brown, Alexander Bukreyev, Anne Balkema-Buschmann, Ursula J. Buchholz, Camila Chabi-Jesus, Kartik Chandran, Chiara Chiapponi, Ian Crozier, Rik L. de Swart, Ralf G. Dietzgen, Olga Dolnik, Jan F. Drexler, Ralf Dürrwald, William G. Dundon, W. Paul Duprex, John M. Dye, Andrew J. Easton, Anthony R. Fooks, Pierre B. H. Formenty, Ron A. M. Fouchier, Juliana Freitas-Astúa, Anthony Griffiths, Roger Hewson, Masayuki Horie, Timothy H. Hyndman, Dàohóng Jiāng, Elliott W. Kitajima, Gary P. Kobinger, Hideki Kondō, Gael Kurath, Ivan V. Kuzmin, Robert A. Lamb, Antonio Lavazza, Benhur Lee, Davide Lelli, Eric M. Leroy, Jiànróng Lǐ, Piet Maes, Shin-Yi L. Marzano, Ana Moreno, Elke Mühlberger, Sergey V. Netesov, Norbert Nowotny, Are Nylund, Arnfinn L. Økland, Gustavo Palacios, Bernadett Pályi, Janusz T. Pawęska, Susan L. Payne, Alice Prosperi, Pedro Luis Ramos-González, Bertus K. Rima, Paul Rota, Dennis Rubbenstroth, Mǎng Shī, Peter Simmonds, Sophie J. Smither, Enrica Sozzi, Kirsten Spann, Mark D. Stenglein, David M. Stone, Ayato Takada, Robert B. Tesh, Keizō Tomonaga, Noël Tordo, Jonathan S. Towner, Bernadette van den Hoogen, Nikos Vasilakis, Victoria Wahl, Peter J. Walker, Lin-Fa Wang, Anna E. Whitfield, John V. Williams, F. Murilo Zerbini, Tāo Zhāng, Yong-Zhen Zhang, Jens H. Kuhn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 34 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 87 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,219,787
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#176
of 4,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,953
of 367,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#6
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,537 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.