↓ Skip to main content

Scope and relevance of a pulmonary biopharmaceutical classification system AAPS/FDA/USP Workshop March 16-17th, 2015 in Baltimore, MD

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS Open, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Scope and relevance of a pulmonary biopharmaceutical classification system AAPS/FDA/USP Workshop March 16-17th, 2015 in Baltimore, MD
Published in
AAPS Open, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41120-015-0002-x
Authors

Jayne E. Hastedt, Per Bäckman, Andrew R. Clark, William Doub, Anthony Hickey, Guenther Hochhaus, Phil J. Kuehl, Claus-Michael Lehr, Peter Mauser, Jason McConville, Ralph Niven, Masahiro Sakagimi, Jeffry G. Weers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 29%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 33 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 39 31%
Chemistry 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 37 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,754,521
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from AAPS Open
#1
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,589
of 396,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS Open
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them