Title |
Ocean trench conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environment Systems and Decisions, December 1982
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02340472 |
Authors |
M. V. Angel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#803,490
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environment Systems and Decisions
#10
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122
of 33,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment Systems and Decisions
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them