@juliafstrand @Wilbix @violetsarebrown to believe that low- and higher-level MS processes are different (with potentially simultaneity/ spat congruence linking all processes to some degree); we've discussed this a few years ago, pointing to object, attenti
RT @_PengyuanWang_: The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing https://t.co/nJrdxIyobp
@IrisVanRooij @o_guest As the abstract rightfully points out, in the multisensory field this “context-dependence” of McGurk is already old news.. Effects beyond simple detection improvement seem all to be dependent on top-down control mechs - we reviewed t
RT @DoguErdener: And another study comparing McGurk stimuli and natural speech https://t.co/HN9H6sHEcz
And another study comparing McGurk stimuli and natural speech https://t.co/HN9H6sHEcz
@jpeelle <3 So glad to see such a call in the study of speech x multisensory influences; the non-naturalistic sem incongruence is what forever bugged me abt it. We tried to draw some parallels b McGurk & nat speech w Salva & @NvanAtteveldt in ou
Top down, bottom up and sensory processing https://t.co/ikR09010bo new review
Multisensory processing and how it works: new review https://t.co/60NizfwFTy
レビュー。The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing https://t.co/X3PMYhQhsj
RT @mick_crosse: The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing #ExpBrainRes https://t.co/kCaGUOTiWp
The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing #ExpBrainRes https://t.co/kCaGUOTiWp
RT @paweljmatusz: Our review w/@NvanAtteveldt etal on top-down mechanisms cntrllng procssing of multisensory objcts now avlble online https…
Our review w/@NvanAtteveldt etal on top-down mechanisms cntrllng procssing of multisensory objcts now avlble online https://t.co/QEBHQzSjbB