RT @mongol_fi: @quay_dr It's not unusual though that the region of RdRp would have about 98.6% nucleotide identity (365/370) in two viruses…
@quay_dr It's not unusual though that the region of RdRp would have about 98.6% nucleotide identity (365/370) in two viruses that have about 96.1% identity in the whole genome. Tor2 has only 3 nucleotide changes from WIV1 and SHC014 in the same region. htt
@MonaRahalkar In the Ge et al. 2016 paper where the RdRp fragment of 4991 was published, it was specifically called the "conserved 440-bp RdRp fragment": https://t.co/dWc3dKJcc3. They sequenced the same segment from alphacoronaviruses, where it's one of th
@Agus_Z_X @quay_dr @Rootclaim ... The sequence, along with 293 other coronavirus sequences, was deposited in GenBank (accession number KP876546) that same year. Initially, it was just an ID number, ID4991, with little significance in a paper about 293 cor
@BiosafetyNow When I checked this paper the 293 sars-cov-2 number didn’t pop out to me. Nor did the 284 or 9 figures. https://t.co/31MK0hmTar Can you all touch on this point? https://t.co/zFigNiqGlD
RT @Ayjchan: The Sunday Times recently confirmed that RaTG13 is actually a sample called RaBtCoV/4991 from this 2016 paper published by the…
@BillyBostickson and @Daoyu15 Actually nvm about my question, I found a possible related study to the 2 coronaviruses in 2016 (HiBtCoV/3740-2 and RaBtCoV/4991) https://t.co/NdXWGuCXBt
@jhas5 @EmaNymton90 @BiophysicsFL They had to publish it b/c it was clear that the WIV had the closest match to SC2 in their freezers since they already published a 360 bp RdRp seq (KP876546) of BtCoV 4991 (RaTG13) in 2016. https://t.co/1sYfiPLdpK https://
@KatzOnEarth @RottenInDenmark @oneunderscore__ @zeynep Also, the lab did collect the virus itself: https://t.co/fUDcjiRb3f
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @XipingZhao: 石/胡等人故意掩蓋了這一點。是情願還是不情願,我不知道。 他們在礦洞中發現了 9 個 sarbecovs,但只向科學界報告了 1 個。 他們直到 2021 年 5 月才透露這一點。 https://t.co/11EIQARB4t… https:/…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @mattwridley: Correct.
RT @mattwridley: Correct.
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @mattwridley: Correct.
RT @mattwridley: Correct.
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @mattwridley: Correct.
RT @mattwridley: Correct.
Correct.
RT @XipingZhao: 石/胡等人故意掩蓋了這一點。是情願還是不情願,我不知道。 他們在礦洞中發現了 9 個 sarbecovs,但只向科學界報告了 1 個。 他們直到 2021 年 5 月才透露這一點。 https://t.co/11EIQARB4t… https:/…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
RT @XipingZhao: 石/胡等人故意掩蓋了這一點。是情願還是不情願,我不知道。 他們在礦洞中發現了 9 個 sarbecovs,但只向科學界報告了 1 個。 他們直到 2021 年 5 月才透露這一點。 https://t.co/11EIQARB4t… https:/…
RT @jhouse678: @JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs…
石/胡等人故意掩蓋了這一點。是情願還是不情願,我不知道。 他們在礦洞中發現了 9 個 sarbecovs,但只向科學界報告了 1 個。 他們直到 2021 年 5 月才透露這一點。 https://t.co/11EIQARB4t… https://t.co/0kguEvUDam…
@JamieMetzl Shi/Hu and others covered this up, deliberately. Willingly or unwillingly, I don’t know. They found 9 sarbecovs in the mine shaft and reported only 1 to the scientific community. They didn’t reveal this until May 2021. https://t.co/lDZ6Gyo5ny h
@SharriMarkson In hindsight now, it is remarkable Dr. Shi/Hu published the Feb 2016 paper on the Mojiang mineshaft finds but only showed a single novel beta sl Cov in her chart, when in fact they had found many. They covered it up. https://t.co/lDZ6Gyo5n
RT @Alicia1984N: Hoe weet je waar de mijnwerkers aan dood gingen, danwel heel ziek van werden? Wat is daarover gepubliceerd? Hebben ze een…
RT @Alicia1984N: Hoe weet je waar de mijnwerkers aan dood gingen, danwel heel ziek van werden? Wat is daarover gepubliceerd? Hebben ze een…
RT @Alicia1984N: Hoe weet je waar de mijnwerkers aan dood gingen, danwel heel ziek van werden? Wat is daarover gepubliceerd? Hebben ze een…
RT @Alicia1984N: Hoe weet je waar de mijnwerkers aan dood gingen, danwel heel ziek van werden? Wat is daarover gepubliceerd? Hebben ze een…
RT @Alicia1984N: Hoe weet je waar de mijnwerkers aan dood gingen, danwel heel ziek van werden? Wat is daarover gepubliceerd? Hebben ze een…
RT @Alicia1984N: Hoe weet je waar de mijnwerkers aan dood gingen, danwel heel ziek van werden? Wat is daarover gepubliceerd? Hebben ze een…
@Florin_Uncovers And in Shi’s Feb 2016 paper, we now have more evidence that chart was a lie. They had in fact found more than one beta-sl-CoV in the mineshaft. https://t.co/lDZ6Gyo5ny https://t.co/bLJ7RMguoL
Hoe weet je waar de mijnwerkers aan dood gingen, danwel heel ziek van werden? Wat is daarover gepubliceerd? Hebben ze een ziekteverwekker kunnen identificeren in het lab? Lijkt mij dat sputum e.d. dan uitgebreid onderzocht zijn, toch? Misschien zelfs autop
9/ ...de mijnwerkers gingen waarschijnlijk dood aan een SCHIMMEL, niet een virusinfectie. En het lab oogstte GEEN VIRUS, alleen stukjes RNA (erfelijk materiaal), uit poep. Dat hielden ze niet stil, maar schreven ze gewoon in vakblad: https://t.co/6RwPke
Likewise, the PhD thesis did not "reveal" that WIV had been sampling the mine: this was described in Ge et al. 2016… ▫️10/ https://t.co/yJ6CFLVjwz https://t.co/CtprXQZZcR
@DavidBahry @SashaGusevPosts @nytimes @benjmueller 2016 dude RaTag13 https://t.co/3KVpukzhVM
@NwaigboOdera @abhishek_s_1 @nerdtechgasm This evidence from 2016? https://t.co/cI9xiuq970 Or this from 2013? https://t.co/J2BdLrumDf
@DelcoElite @JasonAbbruzzese @lawrencehurley The most similar known existing virus to Covid is one that Shi worked with since 2016 https://t.co/wvtIMTDKY4 Wuhan lab staff sought treatment prior to confirmation of outbreak https://t.co/5lumejyb5U Pretty
@CaulfieldTim Or jumped from bats to humans to animals at the market. https://t.co/VdFfBWsNtW
@Science_Berry O čem ti to? A si iz mene zaroto naredila? Glede lab-leaka sem precej konsistenten od 2020, npr. https://t.co/GLg1PAeD5D.
Le virus avait été précédemment associé à un autre nom, celui de l'échantillon correspondant (RaBtCoV/4991), et le papier de 2016 dans lequel ce virus avait été initialement rendu public n'est pas cité par Zhou et al.. ▫️3/ https://t.co/qCjX6JBjHa
RT @Dr_Al911: House E&C Committee's Letter to Peter Daszak. The part related to RaTG13👇 https://t.co/ux5mZuXT7W https://t.co/Or8SGTwZ8l
RT @Dr_Al911: House E&C Committee's Letter to Peter Daszak. The part related to RaTG13👇 https://t.co/ux5mZuXT7W https://t.co/Or8SGTwZ8l
House E&C Committee's Letter to Peter Daszak. The part related to RaTG13👇 https://t.co/ux5mZuXT7W https://t.co/Or8SGTwZ8l
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
@johnnyvento2 @TomFromTheGrave @BretWeinstein @neiltyson You didn't read my article. BtCoV/4991 was first described in 2016. It is a 370 nucleotide virus fragment collected from the Mojiang mine in 2013 by the lab of Zeng-li Shi at the WIV. BtCoV/4991 is 1
@Tom_Maguire @mattyglesias “per WSJ” is a lot to hang things on. The virus was discussed in various publications, masters theses, etc. in the open literature. E.g. https://t.co/d0d9MTPDGD
Ge et al. (2016), which introduced Ra4991, provides a map locating the Mojiang mine were the samples were collected, but the authors did not give the reason why the mine was sampled. ▫️23/n https://t.co/OFFrbpEUnH https://t.co/Q0YHiWVIjZ
RT @jhas5: @lissnup Fauci paid for RaTG13 collection https://t.co/5UUC0UmZCS https://t.co/jtAeFwTHcr
@lissnup Fauci paid for RaTG13 collection https://t.co/5UUC0UmZCS https://t.co/jtAeFwTHcr
@TheEthanIverson @zhihuachen Obviously "new strain of SL-CoVs" not ignored by WIV. https://t.co/ljZhH2j0qD https://t.co/yt12Mek92F
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
@mentju4 @past_is_future … pandemic. This has been argued to death. It’s tedious and silly. https://t.co/ECcGYEdHcA https://t.co/tSGuHZS6e8
@breakfast_dogs @TheEthanIverson @stgoldst @past_is_future https://t.co/ECcGYEef28 They wrote about their discovery of RaBatCOV/4991 here (2016). It’s not a mystery. The N protein sequence of the virus from bat sample 4991 was mentioned in a 2014 WIV the
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @stgoldst: There's a slick lie in this article when it says the addendum to the paper describing SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 acknowledges the…
RT @stgoldst: There's a slick lie in this article when it says the addendum to the paper describing SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 acknowledges the…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
There's a slick lie in this article when it says the addendum to the paper describing SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 acknowledges the latter sickened and killed miners in 2012. The link is to an anonymous blog post. The language in addendum says the opposite. https
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
" But NIH had indeed funded work on RaTG13 via EcoHealth Alliance ." #OriginsOfCovid / #COVID19 / #Omicron / #centaurus
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
This would explain why our government has done nothing to find out the origins of the virus. They knew already.
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…
RT @emilyakopp: In a new USRTK email, Francis Collins appears to say NIH didn't fund work on RaTG13, a coronavirus 96% similar to SARS-CoV-…