↓ Skip to main content

Late Holocene fire history and charcoal decay in subtropical dry forests of Puerto Rico

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Late Holocene fire history and charcoal decay in subtropical dry forests of Puerto Rico
Published in
Fire Ecology, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42408-019-0033-0
Authors

Wei Huang, Xianbin Liu, Grizelle González, Xiaoming Zou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 25%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#11,937,207
of 14,995,644 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#79
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,474
of 264,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,995,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them