↓ Skip to main content

Risk, Overdiagnosis and Ethical Justifications

Overview of attention for article published in Health Care Analysis, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Risk, Overdiagnosis and Ethical Justifications
Published in
Health Care Analysis, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10728-019-00369-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy A. Rogers, Vikki A. Entwistle, Stacy M. Carter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,205,146
of 13,337,884 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Analysis
#117
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,938
of 249,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Analysis
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,337,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.