↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 3,265)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2019
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheila H. Ridner, Mary S. Dietrich, Michael S. Cowher, Bret Taback, Sarah McLaughlin, Nicolas Ajkay, John Boyages, Louise Koelmeyer, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Jamie Wagner, Vandana Abramson, Andrew Moore, Chirag Shah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 33%
Researcher 4 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 20%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Unspecified 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#89,874
of 13,549,568 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#15
of 3,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,089
of 253,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,549,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.