↓ Skip to main content

Modeling and prediction of flow-induced hemolysis: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Modeling and prediction of flow-induced hemolysis: a review
Published in
Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10237-019-01137-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad M. Faghih, M. Keith Sharp

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,957,961
of 13,325,587 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology
#59
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,104
of 250,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,325,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.