@BjornLomborg Ok, we agree. Please stop hammering the highest costs are to be paid every year by 2050 :) And GDP costs beyond 2040 are not robust as authors admit in the EMF EU study. Recent studies with same models show negligible GDP impacts for 80% tar
@BjornLomborg In addition, the 5-6% GDP cost in 2050 for the last emission cuts is not robust as even authors admit. More recent studies based on up-to-date technology data show negligible GDP impacts for a similar emission target: https://t.co/5dspGf6MlX
@BjornLomborg More recent studies with similar models rather show that such 80% EU target could imply negligible macroeconomic costs.. https://t.co/5dspGf6MlX
Energy system transition and macroeconomic impacts of a European decarbonization action towards a below 2 °C climate stabilization (open access) https://t.co/DX1GBfAb0N
CC: Energy system transition and macroeconomic impacts of a European decarbonization action towards a below 2 °C climate stabilization https://t.co/r4rJvlgWCG https://t.co/7mnIAzJkWK
Energy system transition and macroeconomic impacts of a European decarbonization action towards a below 2 °C climate stabilization https://t.co/7aYjsrdAzN #climatechange