↓ Skip to main content

Benchmark for Tap-Hole Lifecycle Management Practices in Silicomanganese Production When Submerged Arc Furnace Technology of Circular Design is Applied

Overview of attention for article published in JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS), April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Benchmark for Tap-Hole Lifecycle Management Practices in Silicomanganese Production When Submerged Arc Furnace Technology of Circular Design is Applied
Published in
JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS), April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11837-019-03480-1
Authors

Joalet Dalene Steenkamp, Derek Alan Hayman, Pieter Johannes Andries Bezuidenhout

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,812,122
of 13,234,214 outputs
Outputs from JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS)
#796
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,576
of 249,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS)
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,234,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.