↓ Skip to main content

Middle Holocene menus: dietary reconstruction from coprolites at the Connley Caves, Oregon, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Middle Holocene menus: dietary reconstruction from coprolites at the Connley Caves, Oregon, USA
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12520-019-00828-1
Authors

Katelyn N. McDonough

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 50%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,125,346
of 13,727,890 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#89
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,963
of 256,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,727,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.