↓ Skip to main content

Enantioseparation of chiral β-blockers using polynorepinephrine-coated nanoparticles and chiral capillary electrophoresis

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Enantioseparation of chiral β-blockers using polynorepinephrine-coated nanoparticles and chiral capillary electrophoresis
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00216-019-01641-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Wu, Xue Xiao, Zhenqun Li, Li Jia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#10,626,900
of 13,351,887 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#3,095
of 5,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,294
of 252,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#74
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,351,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,087 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.