| Title |
Hemoadsorption therapy in the critically ill: solid base but clinical haze
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0491-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick M. Honoré, David De Bels, Leonel Barreto Gutierrez, Herbert D. Spapen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,568,245
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#970
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,727
of 437,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.