↓ Skip to main content

Hemoadsorption therapy in the critically ill: solid base but clinical haze

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Hemoadsorption therapy in the critically ill: solid base but clinical haze
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0491-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick M. Honoré, David De Bels, Leonel Barreto Gutierrez, Herbert D. Spapen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 47%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#12,975,905
of 14,719,300 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#587
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,620
of 265,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,719,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them