↓ Skip to main content

A Geohistorical Study of ‘The Rise of Modern Science’: Mapping Scientific Practice Through Urban Networks, 1500–1900

Overview of attention for article published in Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy , November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A Geohistorical Study of ‘The Rise of Modern Science’: Mapping Scientific Practice Through Urban Networks, 1500–1900
Published in
Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy , November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11024-008-9109-8
Authors

Peter J. Taylor, Michael Hoyler, David M. Evans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 9%
France 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 29 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 47%
Arts and Humanities 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 5 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#10,661,285
of 13,401,937 outputs
Outputs from Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
#244
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,302
of 268,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,401,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.