Randomness is problematic for social science research purposes

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Quantity, December 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 196 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 5 X posts from 5 X users, with an upper bound of 10,372 followers.

Krause, M. S. (2019). Randomness is problematic for social science research purposes. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1495–1504. https://t.co/Tr5hArQ4Cg

27 Apr 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

"Because random chance cannot be sufficiently ensured for social science research purposes is logically arguable, what is actually relied upon must be haphazard chance." Krause (2019). Randomness is problematic for social science research purposes https:/

25 Apr 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

7 reasons why true Randomness is inapplicable for social science empirical research purposes. https://t.co/43v1ySCEaU #Statistics #SocialSciences #Randomness

25 Apr 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

Randomness is problematic for social science research purposes https://t.co/A3PIzwpbSi

25 Apr 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

this article reminds the central role of sampling in ANY statistical endeavour... https://t.co/WmuGJxVIoo

25 Apr 2019

Reply Repost Favourite