↓ Skip to main content

New records of invasive mammals from the sub-Antarctic Cape Horn Archipelago

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
New records of invasive mammals from the sub-Antarctic Cape Horn Archipelago
Published in
Polar Biology, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00300-019-02497-1
Authors

Elke Schüttler, Ramiro D. Crego, Lorena Saavedra-Aracena, Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez, Ricardo Rozzi, Nicolás Soto, Jaime E. Jiménez

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Other 2 15%
Unspecified 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Unspecified 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,290,657
of 13,652,000 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#99
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,449
of 255,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,652,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.