↓ Skip to main content

Proton decay in flux compactifications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Proton decay in flux compactifications
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/jhep05(2019)196
Authors

Wilfried Buchmuller, Ketan M. Patel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Physics and Astronomy 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,574,810
of 13,644,402 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#4,956
of 13,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,106
of 254,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#196
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.