↓ Skip to main content

Tolerance of Drosophila Flies to Ibotenic Acid Poisons in Mushrooms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Tolerance of Drosophila Flies to Ibotenic Acid Poisons in Mushrooms
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10886-006-9228-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nobuko Tuno, Kazuo H. Takahashi, Hiroshi Yamashita, Naoya Osawa, Chihiro Tanaka

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 79%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,925,862
of 13,243,534 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#380
of 1,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,366
of 252,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.