↓ Skip to main content

Connections in the classroom: Separating the effects of instructor and peer relatedness in the basic needs satisfaction scale

Overview of attention for article published in Motivation & Emotion, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Connections in the classroom: Separating the effects of instructor and peer relatedness in the basic needs satisfaction scale
Published in
Motivation & Emotion, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11031-019-09765-x
Authors

Heather N. Fedesco, Emily M. Bonem, Cong Wang, Regina Henares

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 55%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,200,076
of 13,622,595 outputs
Outputs from Motivation & Emotion
#197
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,036
of 255,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Motivation & Emotion
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,622,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.