↓ Skip to main content

The inventor’s role: was Schumpeter right?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Economics, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 123)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The inventor’s role: was Schumpeter right?
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00191-009-0157-5
Authors

Pontus Braunerhjelm, Roger Svensson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
Finland 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Bangladesh 1 2%
Unknown 57 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 32 48%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 11%
Unspecified 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 9 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,268,047
of 8,681,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#35
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,795
of 291,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,681,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them