↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for future repeat abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for future repeat abdominal surgery
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00423-016-1414-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chema Strik, Martijn W. J. Stommel, Laura J. Schipper, Harry van Goor, Richard P. G. ten Broek

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 25%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Unspecified 7 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,559,460
of 13,616,773 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#246
of 569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,087
of 255,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,616,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 569 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.