↓ Skip to main content

Directed continuous-time random walk with memory

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal B -- Condensed Matter, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Directed continuous-time random walk with memory
Published in
European Physical Journal B -- Condensed Matter, April 2019
DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2019-90453-y
Authors

Jarosław Klamut, Tomasz Gubiec

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,636,085
of 13,187,018 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal B -- Condensed Matter
#239
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,520
of 253,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal B -- Condensed Matter
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,187,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.