↓ Skip to main content

Long-term care risk misperceptions

Overview of attention for article published in Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance - Issues & Practice, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Long-term care risk misperceptions
Published in
Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance - Issues & Practice, January 2019
DOI 10.1057/s41288-018-00116-4
Authors

Martin Boyer, Philippe De Donder, Claude Fluet, Marie-Louise Leroux, Pierre-Carl Michaud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,266,093
of 13,183,063 outputs
Outputs from Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance - Issues & Practice
#109
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,705
of 253,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance - Issues & Practice
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,183,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.