↓ Skip to main content

Your Liberty or Your Life: Reciprocity in the Use of Restrictive Measures in Contexts of Contagion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Your Liberty or Your Life: Reciprocity in the Use of Restrictive Measures in Contexts of Contagion
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11673-009-9149-2
Authors

A. M. Viens, Cécile M. Bensimon, Ross E. G. Upshur

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Other 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Philosophy 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Psychology 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 3 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,898,982
of 13,177,477 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#150
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,016
of 253,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,177,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.