Worth re-reading the recent piece on the motivations behind such bizarrely blinkered and thin-skinned actors. Can't say I quite understand such a closed disciplinary approach. https://t.co/BEkb1wjFCV
@joebilsborough @paulewart23 @jemgilbert @AntonJaegermm @Jonathan_M_Dean and Bice Maiguashca and Paul Allen have touched on this in their great work on polprofs punditry - basically portraying politics as nerdy can act as a form of gate keeping for suppose
@Chr1sR0berts @jemgilbert Also this one: https://t.co/VcAYVoj34Z
RT @peteraallen: @NickSDickinson @stephenkb This was my solo paper written post 2017 - https://t.co/tCQZfFhETs and this with @David_S_Moon…
@NickSDickinson @stephenkb This was my solo paper written post 2017 - https://t.co/tCQZfFhETs and this with @David_S_Moon post 2019 - https://t.co/CyflP9vDUc. Let me know if you have access issues and I can email if you’re interested.
This develops ideas from my previous paper on the ‘Corbyn problem’ which is in the latest issue of British Politics with some other interesting papers on Corbyn and Labour - https://t.co/tCQZfFzfL0
RT @PalgraveJournal: Another popular article from 2019 is 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' by Peter Allen published in…
Another popular article from 2019 is 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' by Peter Allen published in British Politics. Read it here: https://t.co/kcj95Zr9D9
@ta_mills Thinking you mean this one? https://t.co/UeURxIliue
@sjwrenlewis A nice companion piece to this important article: https://t.co/QUykEVzGiy
@simonk_133 Only half tongue in cheek: Allen (2019) https://t.co/bP1Rf0cjuo Maiguashca & Dean (2019) https://t.co/nV2FhBaKXY
@GoodwinMJ You're a Hypocrite. Unlike youself, the PSA never used erroneous polling data in an article for the Daily Mail: https://t.co/SJdnCnrIKn I assume while too busy as you appeared in a Spiked-Online video, you missed this as well https://t.co/bSOEo9
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: Feels like a good week to RT this paper. Like others (eg @ta_mills) have pointed out, the charge against much coverage of…
RT @peteraallen: Feels like a good week to RT this paper. Like others (eg @ta_mills) have pointed out, the charge against much coverage of…
RT @peteraallen: Feels like a good week to RT this paper. Like others (eg @ta_mills) have pointed out, the charge against much coverage of…
RT @peteraallen: Feels like a good week to RT this paper. Like others (eg @ta_mills) have pointed out, the charge against much coverage of…
RT @peteraallen: Feels like a good week to RT this paper. Like others (eg @ta_mills) have pointed out, the charge against much coverage of…
Excellent paper here which questions the dominant assumptions held by political commentators and how they influence the political landscape.
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
Feels like a good week to RT this paper. Like others (eg @ta_mills) have pointed out, the charge against much coverage of Corbyn isn’t bias in the sense that individuals are twisting stories, but bias as predispositions & shared assumptions, etc., root
@paulewart23 Similar theme, also very good https://t.co/MySEub3Uxp
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
Yet as a discipline we seem intent on scrubbing ideas from the face of our analysis. This article seems to tick all those boxes @peteraallen identifies in his recent article: https://t.co/MySEub3Uxp
@hakhverdian ben wel benieuwd naar zijn reactie op: https://t.co/141HWYjP34
does anyone have access to this article? wouldn't mind a gander. https://t.co/oRtn1Fojmg
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @drjennings: @OwenJones84 @simonjhix @peteraallen wrote a very thoughtful critique on political science commentary and Corbyn/Labour rec…
@OwenJones84 @simonjhix @peteraallen wrote a very thoughtful critique on political science commentary and Corbyn/Labour recently, which I would recommend. https://t.co/Aay7alu6z7
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @pottmeister: This is a very interesting article on - to paraphrase clumsily - the blind spots of political punditry; many points have…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: Read-only version is here https://t.co/0ltkDEaNGz
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @pottmeister: This is a very interesting article on - to paraphrase clumsily - the blind spots of political punditry; many points have…
RT @pottmeister: This is a very interesting article on - to paraphrase clumsily - the blind spots of political punditry; many points have…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
This is a very interesting article on - to paraphrase clumsily - the blind spots of political punditry; many points have a relevance well beyond the paper's specific subject.
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
It's taken from 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' by Peter Allen: https://t.co/J8mwCaBvUi
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: Read-only version is here https://t.co/0ltkDEaNGz
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: Read-only version is here https://t.co/0ltkDEaNGz
This should be essential reading for ALL TV and radio pundits. A clickable link is given in Peter's next tweet. @bbclaurak @bbcnickrobinson @Peston @jonsnowC4 @BBCPolitics
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
.@TomLondon6 Peter's paper seems to download from here.
I find this argument bizarre. There’s some truth in saying that commentators have biases which they assert as truth. But this doesn’t seem to acknowledge that they react to Corbyn in the way they do because he’s genuinely unpopular and intensely disliked b
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @peteraallen: My paper 'Political science, punditry, and the Corbyn problem' is newly available online at British Politics (£) - https:/…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…
RT @GoodwinMJ: For a couple of years, academics + commentators routinely mocked & dismissed @jeremycorbyn. This paper on that "dismissive a…