| Title |
Masenia nkomatiensis n. sp. (Digenea: Cephalogonimidae) from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) (Clariidae) in Incomati Basin, Mozambique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Parasitology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11230-019-09848-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José Chissiua Dumbo, Quinton Marco Dos Santos, Annemariè Avenant-Oldewage |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,965,775
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#61
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,515
of 350,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.