↓ Skip to main content

Real Lives and Lost Lives: Making Sense of ‘Locked in’ Responses to Intimate Partner Homicide

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Journal of Criminology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 123)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Real Lives and Lost Lives: Making Sense of ‘Locked in’ Responses to Intimate Partner Homicide
Published in
Asian Journal of Criminology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11417-019-09283-2
Authors

Sandra Walklate, Anna Hopkins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 44%
Social Sciences 3 33%
Unspecified 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#10,348,521
of 13,560,184 outputs
Outputs from Asian Journal of Criminology
#44
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,373
of 255,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Journal of Criminology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,560,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.