@bibleradioapp @redeemed_zoomer The study doesn't actually say what you think it says In a follow up, a meta-analysis showed that increased selectivity amongst cohabiting partners did increase the likelyhood of breakups due to incompatibility. See here:
@CyprianoRagol @w_jaroniewska Do tego rosnąca powszechność konkubinatu wymusza ponowne weryfikowanie wniosków, które pochodzą z publikacji z lat 90 czy początku XXI wieku, co zresztą widać na przykładzie innych publikacji https://t.co/hVeIlVVlLr https://t.
RT @Ugo_KelechiPhD: @Wizarab10 "Using pooled data from the 1988, 1995, and 2002 surveys of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), pre…
@Wizarab10 "Using pooled data from the 1988, 1995, and 2002 surveys of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), premarital cohabitation has been found to be positively correlated with the likelihood of divorce..." (Reinhold S., 2010) https://t.co/Fp
@DeemyDeem @D3SK_ @greentexts_bot The paper cite is 20 years old. I found a preview of a paper from 2010 that uses survey data to suggest that the link between pre-marital relationships and divorce is weaker in more recent marriages. I'm sure the full pape
RT @themdansarali: Research shows premarital cohabitation increases the likelihood of divorce, especially for women. The Teachman Heritage…
@ourobororoboruo Teachman restudied, opposite found https://t.co/pBQVlztH6R
RT @themdansarali: Research shows premarital cohabitation increases the likelihood of divorce, especially for women. The Teachman Heritage…
Research shows premarital cohabitation increases the likelihood of divorce, especially for women. The Teachman Heritage Study shows marital stability reduces from 80.47% (virgin) to 29.70% at 5 partners or more. At just 1 partner or more its at 53.63%. ht
@lerensekyo ini kak semua jurnalnya Teachman mirip2 tentang topik ini https://t.co/VrOt0qO4u1
@TheDisposableO1 Oh no, not an outdated study where you don't even understand the conclusions drawn by the author regarding self-selection! It's almost like you haven't looked at either that article or the past 15 years of research, such as... this. https
RT @cjdesilva: @Helrazor Neens, this article rebuts the exact research citations: https://t.co/RkD3lD9Y0T AWESOME
RT @cjdesilva: This article basically validates all my hunch on the loopholes in the research cited in THAT REPLY. Enjoy and share! https:/…
RT @cjdesilva: @Helrazor Neens, this article rebuts the exact research citations: https://t.co/RkD3lD9Y0T AWESOME
RT @cjdesilva: @Helrazor Neens, this article rebuts the exact research citations: https://t.co/RkD3lD9Y0T AWESOME
RT @cjdesilva: @Helrazor Neens, this article rebuts the exact research citations: https://t.co/RkD3lD9Y0T AWESOME
RT @cjdesilva: This article basically validates all my hunch on the loopholes in the research cited in THAT REPLY. Enjoy and share! https:/…
@Helrazor Neens, this article rebuts the exact research citations: https://t.co/RkD3lD9Y0T AWESOME
RT @cjdesilva: This article basically validates all my hunch on the loopholes in the research cited in THAT REPLY. Enjoy and share! https:/…
This article basically validates all my hunch on the loopholes in the research cited in THAT REPLY. Enjoy and share! https://t.co/RkD3lD9Y0T
@ScythianArrows Yeah I don't know if it's smart to hinge a demand for virgin pussy on that study. https://t.co/ZDtVetSipr