↓ Skip to main content

Physical inactivity and vitamin D deficiency in hospitalized elderlies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Physical inactivity and vitamin D deficiency in hospitalized elderlies
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00774-019-00996-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shota Tanabe, Shozo Yano, Seiji Mishima, Atsushi Nagai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 33%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#10,784,392
of 13,549,568 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism
#306
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,369
of 255,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,549,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.