RT @RachaelMorton12: We find surveillance imaging in asymptomatic melanoma patients detects a large number of incidentalomas; increases cos…
RT @RachaelMorton12: We find surveillance imaging in asymptomatic melanoma patients detects a large number of incidentalomas; increases cos…
We find surveillance imaging in asymptomatic melanoma patients detects a large number of incidentalomas; increases costs and risks invasive procedures @heatheconomics #iHEA2019 https://t.co/QLRU8zVaHG
Routine PET/CT surveillance in asymptomatic patients with high-risk melanoma is controversial.
RT SocSurgOnc RT AnnSurgOncol: JUNE ISSUE: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or PET/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients with Resected #StageIIIMelanoma. https://t.co/kXaXFo8ttc McMastersKelly SocSurgOnc https://t.co/Far0NV
RT @AnnSurgOncol: JUNE ISSUE: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or PET/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients…
RT @AnnSurgOncol: JUNE ISSUE: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or PET/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients…
RT @AnnSurgOncol: JUNE ISSUE: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or PET/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients…
RT @AnnSurgOncol: JUNE ISSUE: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or PET/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients…
RT @AnnSurgOncol: JUNE ISSUE: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or PET/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients…
JUNE ISSUE: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or PET/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients with Resected #StageIIIMelanoma. https://t.co/yAJZ7X8lnj @McMastersKelly @SocSurgOnc https://t.co/mQuMRTuvJ9
RT @RachaelMorton12: Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivo…
RT @RachaelMorton12: Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivo…
RT @RachaelMorton12: Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivo…
RT @RachaelMorton12: Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivo…
RT @RachaelMorton12: Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivo…
RT @RachaelMorton12: Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivo…
RT @RachaelMorton12: Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivo…
Perhaps we need better scans rather than more scans for cancer survivors? Our paper shows CT scans in melanoma survivors often get it wrong. @MelanomaAus @billshortenmp @CancerCouncilOz @TrialsCentre @KatyJLBell https://t.co/ia8hSa4UWc
RT @ingentium_mel: False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or #pet/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients with Rese…
False-Positive Results and Incidental Findings with Annual CT or #pet/CT Surveillance in Asymptomatic Patients with Resected Stage III #melanoma. https://t.co/CN2HSoFYal