Evidence shows academics need medical writers "...a real problem in the reporting of academic clinical drug trials." https://t.co/GXQqkNpgNA
"In a follow-up of Danish clinical drug trials, inconsistencies between original research..." #science #research https://t.co/DNjSpr9Ilf
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/SbOxRiRnlf
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/SbOxRiRnlf
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/3RbeRN1swc #trialsjournal
RT @HomeopathicRx: "@averyjenkinsdc: The drugs you are being prescribed are based on corrupt science. https://t.co/JViDNfu7Y1 https://t.co/…
"@averyjenkinsdc: The drugs you are being prescribed are based on corrupt science. https://t.co/JViDNfu7Y1 https://t.co/UsEFy1NnKB"
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/ku8wZgOIh9 @bengoldacre
RT @SysReviews: From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the #reporting of academic drug #trials https://t.co/B4BnzLPeh…
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the #reporting of academic drug #trials https://t.co/B4BnzLPehs #trialsjournal
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/35GX2qyLX6 @juliaoftoronto
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @recnac1: From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/7XrqJt8Asx #SW…
RT @recnac1: From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/7XrqJt8Asx #SW…
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/7XrqJt8Asx #SWOGOnc #JAMAOnc
Overall consistency between protocols and their corresponding published reports was low https://t.co/3RbeRN1swc #trialsjournal
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/SbOxRiRnlf
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @tlassers: Predictably inconsistent. Comparing protocols of non-pharma drug trials with published reports https://t.co/SQzCUIKMGf
Consistency between protocols and publication of academic clinical drug trials https://t.co/wIyFZku4xG
RT @tlassers: Predictably inconsistent. Comparing protocols of non-pharma drug trials with published reports https://t.co/SQzCUIKMGf
RT @tlassers: Predictably inconsistent. Comparing protocols of non-pharma drug trials with published reports https://t.co/SQzCUIKMGf
Predictably inconsistent. Comparing protocols of non-pharma drug trials with published reports https://t.co/SQzCUIKMGf
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
From protocol to published report - consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials via #Trialsjournal: https://t.co/17eAKKT8kc
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/XaqmRtn0Yx
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
RT @danrshan: Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do …
Only 61% of academic drug trials showed consistency between the protocol and results article: https://t.co/CMRd5POgZc How do we change this?
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/DUktMph0Bf
In follow-up clinical trials, inconsistencies between original research protocols & published results were 61%! https://t.co/zBTu5PeMA3
From protocol to published report | study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug #ClinicalTrials - https://t.co/Nt6p9L9o7i
Unacknowledged inconsistencies in reporting of clinical trials undermine the validity of the results #drugtrials https://t.co/ubfw9J3nCL
Discrepancies between protocols & published reports in Danish clinical trials - new via #Trialsjournal: https://t.co/lBVqzjFj4U
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/yXSAwYJ7CX #trialsjournal
RT @ISRCTN: From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials: https://t.co/Z3e1QDCHF6 #Tr…
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials: https://t.co/Z3e1QDCHF6 #Trials
From protocol to published report: study of (in)consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/cVbIyrqmN2 #trialsjournal
RT @steeph: Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
RT @steeph: Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
RT @steeph: Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
RT @steeph: Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
RT @steeph: Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
RT @steeph: Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
RT @steeph: Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
Auw, slechts 39% (29-49%) van onderzochte medicijn-test-onderzoeken consistent met data https://t.co/Wdxp1g69yi
“From protocol to published report: consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials” https://t.co/7S04q55nq9 https://t.co/c92S3m0apB
Protocol to published report:a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/GL3W3PSwoi #trialsjournal #science
https://t.co/x62BvS6HwL unacknowledged discrepancies between protocols and published reports in Danish clinical trials.
Nothing new, but <50% of clinical trials were consistent between protocol and publication #OutcomeSwitching https://t.co/AcWC8PiQc9
The drugs you are being prescribed are based on corrupt science. https://t.co/IUxW01Kmrn https://t.co/jjoPFDpd9r
In a follow-up of Danish clinical drug trials, inconsistencies between original research protocols (n=95) and ... https://t.co/vD4JrBMlxR
Overall consistency between drug trial protocols & their corresponding published reports was low https://t.co/pUSWqrvmV0
Low consistency between published protocols and published data in clinical drug trials. https://t.co/FEdPvllKoJ
RT @COMPare_Trials: And this doesn't includ discrepancies that were declared! https://t.co/DgZldprEB0
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials https://t.co/KECIJOk2zc #trialsjournal
And this doesn't includ discrepancies that were declared! https://t.co/DgZldprEB0
In a follow-up of Danish clinical drug trials, inconsistencies between original research protocols (n=95) and the … https://t.co/sfuaFLHWFM
41% of academic studies had a discrepancy in the primary endpoint between the protocol and published reports. https://t.co/F6mZl6wWlF
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials | Trials | https://t.co/Qurvfcu2JP