| Title |
Mine tailing disposal sites: contamination problems, remedial options and phytocaps for sustainable remediation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11157-017-9453-y |
| Authors |
Oznur Karaca, Claudio Cameselle, Krishna R. Reddy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 195 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 31 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 12% |
| Chemical Engineering | 12 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 74 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#601,241
of 24,037,774 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#3
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,322
of 445,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them