↓ Skip to main content

Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words
Published in
Reading and Writing, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2
Authors

Joanne F. Carlisle, Lauren A. Katz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 25%
Social Sciences 18 20%
Linguistics 18 20%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#243
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,667
of 67,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.