↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of pure laparoscopic Glissonian pedicle approach hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes of pure laparoscopic Glissonian pedicle approach hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6380-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Liu, Hongwei Xu, Qin Li, Yonggang Wei, Hongyu Li, Wentao Wang, Tianfu Wen, Hong Wu, Jiayin Yang, Mingqing Xu, Bo Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Computer Science 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#10,022,954
of 13,110,675 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,815
of 3,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,017
of 251,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#82
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,110,675 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.