Title |
Short-term and long-term results of a randomized study comparing high tie and low tie inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic rectal anterior resection: subanalysis of the HTLT (High tie vs. low tie) study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-018-6363-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shoichi Fujii, Atsushi Ishibe, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Hirokazu Suwa, Jun Watanabe, Chikara Kunisaki, Itaru Endo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,012,698
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,493
of 6,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,388
of 329,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#34
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.