↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Geomorphosites and the Geomorphological Hazards that Impact them: Case Study—Cozia Massif (Southern Carpathians, Romania)

Overview of attention for article published in Geoheritage, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating Geomorphosites and the Geomorphological Hazards that Impact them: Case Study—Cozia Massif (Southern Carpathians, Romania)
Published in
Geoheritage, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12371-019-00352-7
Authors

Adriana-Bianca Ovreiu, Laura Comănescu, Iulian-Andrei Bărsoianu, Alexandru Nedelea

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Other 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 73%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,561,572
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Geoheritage
#215
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,610
of 351,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoheritage
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.