↓ Skip to main content

High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
204 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
Title
High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Rochwerg, D. Granton, D. X. Wang, Y. Helviz, S. Einav, J. P. Frat, A. Mekontso-Dessap, A. Schreiber, E. Azoulay, A. Mercat, A. Demoule, V. Lemiale, A. Pesenti, E. D. Riviello, T. Mauri, J. Mancebo, L. Brochard, K. Burns

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 419 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Other 40 10%
Student > Postgraduate 37 9%
Researcher 35 8%
Student > Master 31 7%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 157 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 10%
Engineering 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 162 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#208,764
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#150
of 5,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,492
of 364,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.