↓ Skip to main content

Nasal high-flow preoxygenation for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill patient? Pro

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Nasal high-flow preoxygenation for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill patient? Pro
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05588-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Damien Ricard, Cesare Gregoretti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,208,653
of 13,093,074 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,577
of 3,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,148
of 248,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#82
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,093,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.