↓ Skip to main content

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic repeat liver resection after open liver resection: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic repeat liver resection after open liver resection: a systematic review
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-06754-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taiga Wakabayashi, Emanuele Felli, Riccardo Memeo, Pietro Mascagni, Yuta Abe, Yuko Kitagawa, Patrick Pessaux

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,731,525
of 13,226,891 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,538
of 3,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,399
of 295,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#51
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.